IS NAPSTER GOOD OR BAD?
YOU DECIDE!


EMINEM HAS A LITTLE PROBLEM WITH NAPSTER.
AND SO DOES METALLICA!

In April of 2000, the heavy metal group Metallica sued Napster because the feel that artist should be finacially compensated for their work. They felt Napster was robbing them of that privilage. In their written statement, Metallica said,"Napster has built a business based on large-scale piracy." The Recording Industry Association of America has already sued Napster, contending that the firm allows massive copyright violations by facilitating the easy exchange of music. Dr. Dre and Metallica have contracted laywer Howard King to represent them in the battle. Said Howard, "At some point in time, Napster is going to have to pay the price for the hundreds of thousands of infringements that occurred on the service. If Napster goes to a subscription model, where the only music that is available is with the consent of the artists, Metallica and Dr. Dre will be happy with that, but that doesn't mean we forgive and forget the past infringements."

They're not the only ones who are mad. Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs told the RIAA that he could not believe that Napster was linking thousands of people to the Notorious BIG album "Born Again," a week before it even hit the streets.

Thoughts of famous people in the music industry :

"I am excited about the opportunities presented by the Internet because it allows artists to communicate directly with fans. But the bottom line must always be respect and compensation for creative work. I am against Internet piracy and it is wrong for companies like Napster and others to promote stealing from artists online." -- Elton John


"It's high-tech bootlegging, with artists definitely losing revenue. I appreciate that people like my music enough to download it. But we need to join forces and fight this." -- DJ Scratch, artist/producer Billboard, April 15, 2000
"...We send them [artists] to Napster and they see all their work being given away for free, and they're stunned and horrified. What disturbs me the most is that artists are never discussed. Artists just seem to be a ping-pong ball whacked back and forth and nobody gives a fuck about them...And it turns out Napster's no better than the record companies. In fact, they're worse, because they're offering nothing and taking everything. Napster's the tip of the iceberg. The broader question is intellectual property on the Internet. Intellectual property should be valued and protected or we'll go down. And not just music either. Why would anybody sit down and write a novel it it's going to be pirated for free the first day it's released. If nobody values intellectual property, then we'll all be in the insurance business." -- Ron Stone, Gold Mountain Management (represents Bonnie Raitt, Tracy Chapman, Ziggy Marley and others Salon, March 25, 2000
"Napster is robbing me blind." -- Chris Robinson, Black Crowes Salon, March 25, 2000
OH YEAH, DR. DRE ALSO HAS A PROBLEM!!
Menu
HOME LOCAL OPINIONS NAPSTER BACKGROUND SOURCES & OTHER SITES

CONTACT WEBMASTER
oscarec@ufl.edu
©2000